When should school leaders use AI writing tools, and when shouldn't they?
AI is powerful for drafting — generating a first version of an email, a newsletter section, or evaluation language that you then edit in your own voice. It's especially useful for overcoming the blank-page problem on writing tasks that aren't your primary expertise.
Where it gets risky is in high-stakes judgment. AI can't observe a classroom. It can't assess whether a teacher's practice has genuinely improved. It can't weigh the political dynamics of a difficult staffing decision. When you use AI to draft evaluation narratives, you must ensure the result sounds like you, reflects your actual observations, and represents your professional judgment — not a generic summary.
The test is simple: would you be comfortable telling the teacher that AI helped you write this? If the answer is no, you're relying on it too heavily. The tool should extend your capacity, not replace your judgment.
More on Technology for School Leaders
How can technology help me get into classrooms more?
By removing friction from the parts of your job that keep you at your desk.
How should schools approach technology adoption and training?
The same way they should approach any change initiative: start with early adopters, build success, and let that success convince the majority.
See all questions on Technology for School Leaders →
There are also 19 more questions on EdTech & AI answered from video content — see the full EdTech & AI FAQ →
Answered by Justin Baeder, PhD, Director of The Principal Center and author of three books on instructional leadership.