How do I handle a negative teacher evaluation?
With extensive evidence, clear communication, and no surprises. A negative evaluation should never be the first time a teacher hears about your concerns. If you've been in their classroom regularly and having honest conversations throughout the year, the evaluation is a summary of what you've already discussed — not a blindside.
The principle is simple: every teacher should know exactly where they stand before the final evaluation is written. If they'd be surprised by a negative rating, that's a failure of communication, not a failure of the teacher.
For teachers on a potential dismissal path, documentation is everything. Collect evidence consistently, communicate concerns clearly and in writing, provide specific support and timelines, and follow your district's process to the letter. You can't half-fire someone — ambiguous evaluations that hint at problems without naming them help no one and protect nothing.
More on Teacher Evaluation
How do I write teacher evaluations that are both fair and efficient?
The biggest efficiency gain comes from a counterintuitive realization: you don't need to write every teacher's evaluation from scratch.
How should I allocate my evaluation time across all my teachers?
Unequally, and on purpose.
What is the CEIJ model for writing evaluation narratives?
CEIJ stands for Claim, Evidence, Interpretation, Judgment — and it's a structure for writing evaluation narratives that are clear, defensible, and genuinely useful.
Can teacher evaluations actually improve retention?
Yes — if you reframe them as relationship-building opportunities rather than compliance exercises.
See all questions on Teacher Evaluation →
There are also 36 more questions on Walkthroughs & Evaluation answered from video content — see the full Walkthroughs & Evaluation FAQ →
Answered by Justin Baeder, PhD, Director of The Principal Center and author of three books on instructional leadership.