How do I write teacher evaluations that are both fair and efficient?
The biggest efficiency gain comes from a counterintuitive realization: you don't need to write every teacher's evaluation from scratch. Strong teachers tend to share common patterns of practice — careful planning, strong classroom management, responsive instruction. The specific evidence differs, but the narrative structures are similar. That means you can develop a library of well-written descriptions that you customize with specific evidence for each teacher.
This isn't cutting corners. It's recognizing that quality evaluation writing, like quality teaching, benefits from reusable structures. The customization comes from the evidence — the specific observations, quotes, and examples that make each evaluation unique to that teacher.
Where you invest your custom writing time is on the teachers who need it most: those who are struggling, new to the profession, or on a formal improvement path. That's where individualized, detailed narrative makes the biggest difference — for the teacher, for students, and for documentation.
More on Teacher Evaluation
How should I allocate my evaluation time across all my teachers?
Unequally, and on purpose.
What is the CEIJ model for writing evaluation narratives?
CEIJ stands for Claim, Evidence, Interpretation, Judgment — and it's a structure for writing evaluation narratives that are clear, defensible, and genuinely useful.
How do I handle a negative teacher evaluation?
With extensive evidence, clear communication, and no surprises.
Can teacher evaluations actually improve retention?
Yes — if you reframe them as relationship-building opportunities rather than compliance exercises.
See all questions on Teacher Evaluation →
There are also 36 more questions on Walkthroughs & Evaluation answered from video content — see the full Walkthroughs & Evaluation FAQ →
Answered by Justin Baeder, PhD, Director of The Principal Center and author of three books on instructional leadership.